For Fund Selectors
With our first-of-its-kind quantitative benchmarking and in-depth analyses of proxy voting records and engagement, finding asset managers who meet your
best-in-class criteria has never been simpler.
Credibility is hard to quantify
Your clients demand credibility in sustainable investing, yet it’s hard to define and deliver. Common ESG metrics can be confusing and fail to capture the essentials of stewardship. A majority of fund selectors report "shifting targets around regulation and ratings are leading to ESG fatigue."
Fund selectors don't have the right data to make evidence-based decisions
Delivering best-in-class funds requires clear insight into the key metrics that define credible stewardship.
Selectors that cannot effectively sift through data to identify credible players risk contributing to misleading practices in sustainable investing.
But Now There's rezonanz...
Quantitative Benchmarking
Leverage our composite "Voting for Sustainability" benchmark, developed with insights from sustainability experts, or create a custom benchmark to systematically measure and monitor asset managers' proxy voting records.
Comprehensive Manager Analysis
Our systems-level approach to stewardship integrates engagement disclosures and collaborative initiative memberships, allowing fund selectors to analyze and compare the ambition and performance of different asset managers.
These insights enable fund selectors to optimize their selection approach and identify high-impact strategies.
Simplified Due Diligence
rezonanz compiles all disclosures in an easy-to-navigate interface, saving your team significant time and resources
amplifying investors' voices to enable better decisions